This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Apr. 2, 2013

Beware using real property liens as security for fees

When you take a "FLARPL" against the community interest, you take it subject to the risk that the market or the facts of the case may "eat up [your] client's interest in the property." By Mitchell A. Jacobs and John Adam Lazor


By Mitchell A. Jacobs and John Adam Lazor


In the recent case In re Marriage of Turkanis and Price, 213 Cal. App. 4th 332 (Cal. App. 2d Dist, Jan. 30, 2013), the Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's decision to expunge the Family Law Attorney Real Property Liens, or FLARPLs, recorded by wife's counsel and only grant a small percentage of the attorney fees requested in her counsel's Borson motion.


Richard and Joan ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up