This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Forum (Forum & Focus)

Oct. 28, 2008

Gambling on Jurisdiction

Personal jurisdiction is of practical importance for casinos, because it answers the question of whether the casino can be sued in another state, writes I. Nelson Rose.

FORUM COLUMN

By I. Nelson Rose

I am the co-editor-in-chief of the Gaming Law Review, the law journal covering gaming law. Two cases we report in Volume 12, No. 1, involve patrons who were involved in auto accidents suing casinos. The allegations are typical: The casinos supposedly got the drivers who caused the accident drunk. Nothing unusual about that. What is different is that the suits were filed in Kentucky and Arkansas, states without casino...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up