This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You must have a membership to view this page.

Labor/Employment

Aug. 31, 2005

'Cupertino' Makes Enforcing Arbitration Easier for Unions

Focus Column - Labor - By Bernhard Rohrbacher - The right to have grievances heard by an arbitrator rather than by a court is so important to unions that they are willing to give up the right to strike in exchange. See California State Council of Carpenters v. Superior Court , 89 Cal.App.3d 144 (1970) (no-strike clause is quid-pro-quo for arbitration provision); Butchers' Union Local 229 v. Cudahy Packing Co. , 66 Cal.2

        
        
        
    ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up