Litigation
Mar. 3, 2015
Ruling puts arbitration first, state law claims second
A state appellate court ruling that fills in one of the gaps left by a landmark California Supreme Court employment ruling has left attorneys wondering how much the outcome will hurt future plaintiffs.
Daily Journal Staff Writer
A state appellate court ruling that fills in one of the gaps left by a landmark California Supreme Court employment ruling has left attorneys wondering how much the outcome will hurt future plaintiffs.
While the state high court has permitted worker claims under California's Private Attorneys General Act to proceed in its Iskanian decision despite a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that favors ar...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In