Perspective
Mar. 3, 2015
LETTER: Deceptive slant in column about Yates
I am surprised that the Daily Journal would print Mark Miller's one-sided diatribe about the Supreme Court's Yates decision. By Richard A. Derevan
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR COLUMN
I am surprised that the Daily Journal would print Mark Miller's one-sided diatribe about the Supreme Court's Yates decision, which held that a fish is not a "tangible object" for the purposes of the Sarbanes-Oxley act. ["Court rejects fishy charges," Feb. 26]. While Miller may have point about the prosecution's choice to indict Captain Yates under that statute, one is baffled how can it be "obviously inapplicable...For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In