This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation

Feb. 19, 2015

Los Angeles federal judge disqualifies firm from major case over conflict

A conflict of interest disqualifies Squire Patton Boggs LLP from representing the sugar industry in a case in which the firm has already worked more than 20,000 hours and billed clients more than $12 million, a federal judge ruled Tuesday.


By Hadley Robinson


Daily Journal Staff Writer


A conflict of interest disqualifies Squire Patton Boggs LLP from representing the sugar industry in a case in which the firm has already worked more than 20,000 hours and billed its clients more than $12 million, a federal judge ruled Tuesday.


The problem arose because law firms Squire, Sanders & Dempsey and Patton Boggs LLP represented adverse clients in a case pitting titans of the sugar ind...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up