Focus (Forum & Focus)
Nov. 14, 2007
Verdict Against Ford in SUV Rollover Case Not the Injustice Automaker Claims
Forum Column - By Louis G. Arnell - Though it's been portrayed as a matter of evidence admissibility, the verdict finding Ford liable for the safety deficiencies of the Explorer was based on the company's brazen refusal to address serious flaws in the vehicle's design.
By Louis G. Arnell
As trial counsel for Benetta Buell-Wilson and Barry Wilson in Buell Wilson v. Ford Motor Co., 141 Cal.App.4th 525 (2006) (a case involving Ford's liability for rollover accidents in their Explorer SUVs), I am compelled to respond to Robert A. Philipson's numerous misstatements in his article "Taking Aim at Evidence," which appeared in the Nov. 2 edition of the Daily Journal.
&nbs...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
