This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Focus (Forum & Focus)

Nov. 14, 2007

Verdict Against Ford in SUV Rollover Case Not the Injustice Automaker Claims

Forum Column - By Louis G. Arnell - Though it's been portrayed as a matter of evidence admissibility, the verdict finding Ford liable for the safety deficiencies of the Explorer was based on the company's brazen refusal to address serious flaws in the vehicle's design.

FORUM COLUMN

By Louis G. Arnell

      As trial counsel for Benetta Buell-Wilson and Barry Wilson in Buell Wilson v. Ford Motor Co., 141 Cal.App.4th 525 (2006) (a case involving Ford's liability for rollover accidents in their Explorer SUVs), I am compelled to respond to Robert A. Philipson's numerous misstatements in his article "Taking Aim at Evidence," which appeared in the Nov. 2 edition of the Daily Journal.
 &nbs...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up