Environmental
Aug. 7, 2009
Stream of Consciousness
A Senate bill declares that the Clean Water Act is intended to cover even small and intermittent streams, writes Norman A. Dupont.
Even by its own standards, the Supreme Court's decision interpreting the jurisdictional limits of the Clean Water Act, Rapanos v. U.S., 554 U.S. 715 (2006), was a fractured opinion that left more questions than it answered. Four members of the court, in Justice Anthony Scalia's plurality opinion, sought to limit the Clean Water Act's definition of "navigable waters" to those that were navigable in the most traditi...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In