This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Labor/Employment

Aug. 26, 2010

Want to Get Paid? Don't Inflate Your Bill

The court encourages counsel to litigate meritorious FEHA claims, but an exaggerated fee request could hurt your case.

Thomas L. Dorogi

Fax: (818) 297-1775

What happens when a litigant presents an inflated attorney fee request based on a low jury verdict to a trial court? The answer may be found in Chavez v. City of Los Angeles (2010) 47 Cal.4th 970, a case that is unarguably a victory for California employers, but one with limited applicability to most Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) cases. Defense lawyers hoping to successfully apply the reasoning of Chavez to gut attorney fee motions whenever a jury awards a FEHA pl...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails