Where a plaintiff files a malpractice action in a California court secondary to a loss in a patent infringement action, does the right to relief necessarily depend on resolution of a substantial issue of federal patent law requiring adjudication in federal court? On the record and argument before it, California's 1st District Court of Appeal resoundingly answered the question in the negative. E-Pass Technologies Inc. v. Moses & Sin...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In




