Insurance
Dec. 9, 2010
Californians Say Goodbye to a Portion a Proposition 103
A recent state appellate decision may force consumers to rely on agencies to dispute illegal insurance rate hikes. By Brian S. Kabateck and Lina B. Melidonian of Kabateck Brown Kellner.
The recent California appellate court decision in Amber MacKay et al. v. Sup. Ct. of the State of CA, County of L.A, will have a significant impact on consumers as the boundaries of Proposition 103, which safeguard insureds from the imposition of unfair insurance premiums, seem to now be critically jeopardized. 115 Cal.Rptr.3d 893 (2010)
In 1988, California voters passed Proposition 103, which primarily...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In