This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

California Courts of Appeal

Jul. 10, 2017

Opinion: peace officers don’t have expectation of privacy during raids

The 3-0 decision from the 4th District Court of Appeal is not a full victory for the city of Santa Ana and its attorneys.,

A recently published appellate opinion regarding a high-profile police raid at an Orange County marijuana dispensary establishes that peace officers don’t have a reasonable expectation of privacy when they are executing search warrants.

The 3-0 decision from the 4th District Court of Appeal is not a full victory for the city of Santa Ana and its attorneys, G. Craig Smith and Anthony M. Snodgrass of Ferguson, Praet & Sherman, APC...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up