Jul. 13, 2017
Accountant’s win in fingerprinting case could affect lawyers
A recent court victory by a certified public accountant who refused to pay a $49 fingerprinting fee may shed light on the difficulty the State Bar could face if it attempts to charge thousands of attorneys for re-fingerprinting.
SACRAMENTO — A recent court victory by a certified public accountant who refused to pay a $49 fingerprinting fee may shed light on the difficulty the State Bar could face if it attempts to charge thousands of attorneys for re-fingerprinting.
Last fall, Ned Leiba sued the California Board of Accountancy, challenging the demand he pay for a new set of Live Scan fingerprints and a $500 fine the board levied against him when he refused ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
