This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Insurance

Aug. 27, 2013

Overlooked implications of same-sex marriage decision

There are at least two tax implications relating to real estate that have been little noted. By Bruce Givner and Owen Kaye


By Bruce Givner and Owen Kaye


Since the U.S. Supreme Court's June 26 epochal decision in United States v. Windsor, hundreds of articles have been written about its income tax, estate tax, health care, family law and other implications. Those implications are far-reaching and still evolving. However, there are at least two tax implications relating to real estate that have been little noted.


The first little-noted Windsor impact relates...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up