By Natalie Vance and Heather Rosing
The rise of social media has made obtaining information about the personal and professional lives of complete strangers accessible to the masses through a simple internet search. A few courts have gone so far as to suggest that with respect to jurors, online investigation is not only permissible, but expected. See, e.g., Johnson v. McCullough, 306 S.W.3d 551 (Mo. 2010) (criticizing party who ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In




