This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Constitutional Law

Jul. 19, 2016

Supreme Court declined to hear San Francisco shark fin case this term

Does government regulation of a distinctive ethnic and cultural food item — shark fin soup — amount to unconstitutional race-based discrimination? By Christopher Yeh

By Christopher Yeh

Does government regulation of a distinctive ethnic and cultural food item amount to unconstitutional race-based discrimination? And does a state's regulation of that item run afoul of the Commerce Clause or a differing federal scheme? According to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and the U.S. Supreme Court, the answer is no.

The food item in this case is shark fin ? the key ingredient in shark fin soup, a traditional...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up