By Douglas W. Kmiec
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg recently made reference to her late husband, Martin, when queried about the candidacy of Donald Trump. Martin, who predeceased the once inconceivable and unlikely success of Trump, posited the possibility of such a presidency might prompt a move to New Zealand.
Naturally, Trump rejects the suggestion, and aided by the New York Times, itself, argues that it is wrong for sitting justices to engag...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In