This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Jul. 8, 2016

Supreme Court politicized itself in Second Amendment case

Voisine v. U.S. is evidence that the right to keep and bear arms in self-defense is being banned and restricted case by case. By Nafiz M. Ahmed

By Nafiz M. Ahmed

It's not difficult to ascribe intent when an individual uses force against another and that is the intent of his action. Can it be said, however, that an individual uses force against another when that individual does not intend that his action result in the application of force against another? The U.S. Supreme Court has recently answered that question "yes" in Voisine v. United States, 2016 DJDAR 6311 (June 27, 2016).<...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up