This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

U.S. Supreme Court

Jul. 7, 2016

Abortion decision: Ruling puts abortionists above other physicians

Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt is in direct conflict with the court's stated purpose of legalizing abortion — to make abortion safer. By Alexandra Snyder

By Alexandra Snyder

Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt, 2016 DJDAR 6275 (June 27, 2016), is the first abortion-related case to reach the U.S. Supreme Court since Gonzales v. Carhart, 550 U.S. 124 (2007), decided nearly 10 years ago. In Carhart, the court upheld the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003. Hellerstedt is the most important abortion case the court has heard since Planned Parenthood v....

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up