This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Aug. 28, 2013

Myriad threatens patentability of in vitro stem cells

We are only starting to see the effects of the high court's gene-patentability decision; one concrete example can be seen in a challenge brought related to cultures of human embryonic stem cells. By Jason G. Harp and George Yu


By Jason G. Harp and George Yu


We are only starting to see the effects of the Supreme Court's recent decision finding that isolated, naturally occurring sequences of DNA are not patentable subject matter because they are products of nature, long held to be unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. 101. Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics Inc., 2013 DJDAR 7484 (2013). One concrete consequence can be seen in the challenge brought against Wisconsin ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up