Litigation
Aug. 16, 2013
Pre-election challenges arise from protected activity
Activists gathering signatures for various ballot initiatives can now rest assured that their activity is protected under California's anti-SLAPP statute. By Mark Goldowitz and Evan Mascagni
Activists gathering signatures for various ballot initiatives can now rest assured that their activity is protected under California's anti-SLAPP statute. The 4th District Court of Appeal, Division 2, issued a published opinion last week in Mission Springs Water District v. Verjil, 2013 DJDAR 10535 (Aug. 7, 2013), reversing its earlier rule denying the applicability of the anti-SLAPP law to pre-election challenges to...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In