NPR had a terrific story the other day on the findings of Tali Sharot, a University College London neuroscientist who studies the way in which individuals assess their own personal risk in relation to known risk in the general population. I was particularly interested because this sounds a lot like the way litigants in a particular case assess their case-related risk in relation to the more generalized risk that all litigants face. Professor Sharot was asked to explain why, in a recent s...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In