U.S. Supreme Court,
Constitutional Law
Mar. 5, 2013
Methinks Justice Stevens protests too much
In his latest article on Kelo, Justice John Paul Stevens doubles down and purports to tell us in three easy steps why he was right and everybody else is wrong.
Gideon Kanner
Professor of Law Emeritus, Loyola Law School
USC Law School
Justice John Paul Stevens has done it again. While at first he hinted at the idea that the Kelo v. New London case was one of Supreme Court's achievements that perhaps warranted a mulligan, he now concedes that, as far as the American populace is concerned, it's a lot worse than that. In his latest (second? third?) article on the Kelo case, he concedes that Kelo is viewed as the most widely despised case decided by the Supreme Court in modern times. "Kelo, Pop...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In