This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Feb. 27, 2012

Is it time to re-appraise affirmative action?

More than 15 years after Proposition 209, Black and Hispanic students remain under-enrolled at UC campuses. By Mark S. Williams of Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP


By Mark S. Williams


FIRST IN A TWO-PART SERIES


On Feb. 13, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, et al. v. Arnold Schwarzenneger et al., a legal challenge to the constitutionality of Proposition 209, a voter-passed amendment to the California Constitution. Proposition 209 (now found in Article 1, Section 31, of the state Constitution), forbids the state and local agencies from discrimi...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up