Daily Journal Staff Writer
When the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals earlier this year ordered a private health care plan to cover residential treatment for a woman with an eating disorder, the decision struck at the heart of a long-running political and legal debate over insurance coverage for mental health services.
That debate has been front-and-center in numerous legal battles in California due to state and federal laws r...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In