Litigation
Dec. 16, 2011
California’s effort to protect the jury process from ubiquitous social media
California's approach to online juror misconduct is insufficient, leaving judges and practitioners to fill in the gaps. By Michael D. Kibler and Sarah Luppen of Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
On Dec. 8, an Arkansas juror's Twitter postings during sentencing and deliberation in a capital murder case caused the Arkansas Supreme Court to reverse a murder conviction and death sentence and remand the case for a new trial. Prior to opening statements, the trial judge had explicitly instructed jurors not to "Twitter anybody about this case." The juror's actions in spite of the instruction highlight soci...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In