Perspective
Aug. 29, 2011
Does Concepcion mean the death of Gentry?
Gentry was designed to preclude enforcement of the very kind of class action waiver found to be lawful in Concepcion. By Ronald W. Novotny and Robert R. Roginson of Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo
FIRST IN A TWO-PART SERIES
In AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion, issued on April 27, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a clause waiving class action treatment of a party's claims is generally enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), notwithstanding various protections that have been developed under California law over the years for the benefit of both employees and consumers. The Court foun...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In