This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You must have a membership to view this page.

Judges and Judiciary

Sep. 21, 2010

Judicial Election Challenges and Politics: Why You Should Worry

California’s bench boasts its election procedure is independent of politicized judicial elections, except for the for the Superior Court judge loophole, by Barbara Reeves Neal and Richard C. Neal of JAMS.

By Barbara Reeves Neal and Richard C. Neal

Thirty-nine states hold judicial elections. In many of those states, the elections are partisan and large sums of money come into play. Between 2000 and 2009, campaign fundraising by state Supreme Court candidates totaled $206 million. Special interest groups, operating independently of candidates' campaigns, pour millions more into judicial elections. ("The New Politics of Judicial Elections, 2000-2...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up