This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Apr. 29, 2010

Legally Sound but Technologically Wrong

While judges can reach correct decisions on the value of digital evidence, they are at the mercy of "experts" when it comes to issues of spoliation, write Daniel Garrie and Bill Spernow.

By Daniel B. Garrie and Bill Spernow

Today's judges face numerous challenges in determining the truth of the matter at hand, but none is more challenging than ruling on issues that pivot on digital evidence. Gone are the days when the most technically challenging decision was determining if a floppy disk of evidence had been destroyed because a litigant exposed it to a strong magnetic field. Today's legal challenges are extremely technical when it...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up