By David Given
It began as a war of words. The media and entertainment giant Viacom was an early skeptic of YouTube, the video sharing Web site that launched in November 2005. Viacom objected that YouTube's service was facilitating the reproduction, broadcasting and other distribution of copyrighted content without the owner's authority. That objection employed an easily understood optic in the much publicized legal battle over Napster, the music sharing Web site,...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In




