Focus (Forum & Focus)
Dec. 11, 2008
Deep Impact
The Supreme Court's ruling allowing the Navy's use of sonar has broad implications because it rejected the injunction standard utilized by the 9th Circuit, write Sophie N. Froelich and Robert D. Thornton. - Focus Column
FOCUS COLUMN
By Sophie N. Froelich and Robert D. Thornton In a 5-4 decision issued on Nov. 12, Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 2008 DJDAR 16797, the U.S. Supreme Court vacated a preliminary injunction concerning the impact of U.S. Navy training activities on marine mammals. The Supreme Court decision has broad implications because it rejected the injunction standard utilized by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. The Supr...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In