This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Law Practice

Oct. 7, 2008

Justices Appear Split on Cigarette Advertising

Protesters line up outside the U.S. Supreme Court for the first day of the justices' 2008 term. The justices heard arguments over whether federal law pre-empts state law concerning false advertising of low-tar cigarettes.

By Lawrence Hurley

Daily Journal Staff Writer

WASHINGTON - Whether federal law prevents plaintiffs from filing deceptive practice lawsuits against cigarette manufacturers in state courts was at the top of the U.S. Supreme Court's agenda Monday as it kicked off its 2008 term.

There appeared to be little common ground among the justices during the oral argument as to whether federal law pre-empts state law concerning false advertising of low-tar cigarettes...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up