FOCUS COLUMN
By David A. Gerber
This article appears on Page 7.
The first part of this article described the contradictory interpretation of "employer" in the 1909 Copyright Act's work for hire provisions and that same word (plus "employee" and "scope of employment") in the comparable provisions of the successor 1976 Copyright Act. This concluding part traces the genesis of the anomalous interpretation and urges its extirpa...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In