By Douglas W. Kmiec
The rookie year of the Roberts Court was almost a great success. Its one dark moment, Hamdan v. Rumsfeld (2006 U.S. LEXIS 5185), was a doozy. In that single case, the Court told the president he was acting illegally in creating military commissions, told Congress that the Constitution doesn't really mean what it says about its authority to limit the Court's jurisdiction-and...
The rookie year of the Roberts Court was almost a great success. Its one dark moment, Hamdan v. Rumsfeld (2006 U.S. LEXIS 5185), was a doozy. In that single case, the Court told the president he was acting illegally in creating military commissions, told Congress that the Constitution doesn't really mean what it says about its authority to limit the Court's jurisdiction-and...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In