This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Focus (Forum & Focus)

May 16, 2007

Clause Clarification

Focus Column – By Richard Chernick – Under the “separability doctrine,” arbitrators decide whether contracts are valid, but judges decide whether arbitration clauses are, at least usually.

FOCUS COLUMN

By Richard Chernick

      If a contract contains an arbitration agreement, then a claim that the contract is unenforceable, for fraud or other reasons, must be decided by the arbitrator. But a claim that the arbitration clause itself is unenforceable must be decided by the court, the U.S. Supreme Court instructed in Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Manufacturing Co., 388 U.S. 395 (1967).
  &n...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up