Insurance
Jul. 31, 2006
Newest Uses and Abuses of the Genuine-Dispute Doctrine
A while ago, California courts started to summarily adjudicate out (that is, before trial) a bad-faith claim; that would happen if the insurer provided a sufficiently persuasive rationale for its position (whether ultimately correct or not) regarding a legal issue relating to the presence of coverage.
Rex Heeseman
JAMS
555 W 5th St Fl 32
Los Angeles , CA 90013-1055
Phone: (213) 253-9772
Fax: (213) 620-0100
Email: rheeseman@jamsdar.com
Stanford Univ Law School
Rex Heeseman retired from the Los Angeles Count Superior Court bench in 2014. He is at JAMS, Los Angeles. Besides speaking at various MCLE programs, he co-authors The Rutter Group's practice guide on "Insurance Litigation." From 2002 to 2015, he was an adjunct professor at Loyola Law School.
By Rex Heeseman
A while ago, California courts started to summarily adjudicate out (that is, before trial) a bad-faith claim; that would happen if the insurer provided a sufficiently persuasive rationale for its position (whether ultimately correct or not) regarding a legal issue relating to the presence of coverage. See, e.g., Opsal v. United Services Automobile Association, 2 Cal.App.4th 1197 (1991). This "genuine dispute"...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In