Labor/Employment
Jan. 10, 2002
Another Option
Focus Column - By Jon D. Meer and Eric S. Beane, As a result of recent decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court and the California Supreme Court upholding mandatory arbitration of employment disputes, Circuit City Stores Inc. v. Adams , 532 U.S. 105 (2001); Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services Inc. , 24 Cal.4th 83 (2000), employers are requiring arbitration agreements from new hires and current employees or as a condition to receiving a job promotion or other benefit.
Focus Column
By Jon D. Meer and Eric S. Beane
As a result of recent decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court and the California Supreme Court upholding mandatory arbitration of employment disputes, Circuit City Stores Inc. v. Adams, 532 U.S. 105 ...
By Jon D. Meer and Eric S. Beane
As a result of recent decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court and the California Supreme Court upholding mandatory arbitration of employment disputes, Circuit City Stores Inc. v. Adams, 532 U.S. 105 ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In