Judges and Judiciary
Jul. 19, 2002
Dogmatic, Deadly Airedale Loses in Court
Dicta Column - Court Jester - In Roos v. Loeser, 41 Cal.App. 782 (1919), Judge Frank H. Kerrigan found the following for the court, in pertinent part: This is an action for damages alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff by reason of the killing of her dog, of the variety known as Pomeranian, by an Airedale belonging to the defendants. A jury trial was had, and judgment went for the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred dollars. He now appeals from the judgment.
Dicta Column
Court Jester
In Roos v. Loeser, 41 Cal.App. 782 (1919), Judge Frank H. Kerrigan found the following for the court, in pertinent part:
This is an action for damages alleged to have ...
Court Jester
In Roos v. Loeser, 41 Cal.App. 782 (1919), Judge Frank H. Kerrigan found the following for the court, in pertinent part:
This is an action for damages alleged to have ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In