Entertainment & Sports
Dec. 10, 2001
Performer Protection
In Styne v. Stevens, 26 Cal.4th 42 (2001), the California Supreme Court held that the one-year statute of limitations set forth in Section 1700.44(c) of the Talent Agencies Act (Labor Code Sections 1700 to 1700.47) applies to claims for affirmative relief and does not time-bar defenses based on violations of the act.
By Jeffrey Huron
In Styne v. Stevens, 26 Cal.4th 42 (2001), the California Supreme Court held that the one-year statute of limitations set forth in Section 1700.44(c) of the Talent Agencies Act (Labor Code Sections 1700 to 1700.47) applies to claims for affirmative relief and does not time-bar defenses base...
In Styne v. Stevens, 26 Cal.4th 42 (2001), the California Supreme Court held that the one-year statute of limitations set forth in Section 1700.44(c) of the Talent Agencies Act (Labor Code Sections 1700 to 1700.47) applies to claims for affirmative relief and does not time-bar defenses base...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In