Administrative/Regulatory
Nov. 20, 2001
Deference Dilemma
Whether a "day planner" or loose-leaf appointment notebook is a "bound diary" may seem as arcane and inconsequential as any legal question could be, but the debate over this classification has prompted the U.S. Supreme Court to re-examine the critical issue of when and to what degree a court must defer to the legal determinations of administrative agencies. United States v. Mead Corp., 121 S.Ct. 2164 (2001).
By Stuart Miller
Whether a "day planner" or loose-leaf appointment notebook is a "bound diary" may seem as arcane and inconsequential as any legal question could be, but the debate over this classification has prompted the U.S. Supreme Court to re-examine the critical issue of when and to what degree a court must ...
Whether a "day planner" or loose-leaf appointment notebook is a "bound diary" may seem as arcane and inconsequential as any legal question could be, but the debate over this classification has prompted the U.S. Supreme Court to re-examine the critical issue of when and to what degree a court must ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
