Zoning, Planning and Use
Aug. 25, 2000
Not for the Taking
By Anthony Saul Alperin. In Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, 216 F.3d 764 (9th Cir. 2000), the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the ability of local and regional governments to maintain the status quo while devising long-term planning solutions to difficult environmental problems.
By Anthony Saul Alperin
In Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, 216 F.3d 764 (9th Cir. 2000), the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the ability of local and regional governments to maintain the status quo while devising long-term planning solutions to difficult env...
In Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, 216 F.3d 764 (9th Cir. 2000), the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the ability of local and regional governments to maintain the status quo while devising long-term planning solutions to difficult env...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In