Among actions announced Monday by the justices were:
OPINIONS
INDIAN LAW: The court ruled unanimously that Indian tribal courts do not have jurisdiction over state officers who come onto Indian land to serve a warrant. Reversing the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, the court blocked the Fallon Paiute-Shoshone Tribal Court from considering a civil-rights damages claim by a tribal member against Nevada state game warden...
INDIAN LAW: The court ruled unanimously that Indian tribal courts do not have jurisdiction over state officers who come onto Indian land to serve a warrant. Reversing the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, the court blocked the Fallon Paiute-Shoshone Tribal Court from considering a civil-rights damages claim by a tribal member against Nevada state game warden...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In