This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Construction

Aug. 16, 2000

Measure for Measure

By Bernard S. Kamine. The 'Amelco' case totally discredited a misreading of case law arising from an unfortunate choice of words by earlier court opinions.

        By Bernard S. Kamine
        
        The Court of Appeal has made it clear that the total-cost approach to proving damages for breach of a construction contract can be used, in appropriate cases, with public-works contracts. The case of Amelco Elec. v. City of Thousand Oaks, 2000 Cal.App.Lexis 570 (Cal. App. July 19, 200...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up