This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Sep. 9, 2014

News media should draw a line, or the courts will

The publication of gruesome videos, intimate stolen photographs, and emotionally harmful, targeted speech may bring about the opposite of vigorous expression and embrace of the First Amendment. By Amy Gajda


By Amy Gajda


Within the past month or so, those who clicked on the right Internet links could watch video of two beheadings, peruse purloined nude photographs of a host of Hollywood celebrities, and scroll through a trove of cruel messages about suicide aimed at Zelda Williams, Robin Williams' daughter.


Such expression, arguably, is a vindication at least in part of the First Amendment's free-wheeling marketplace of ideas: In-your-face horrific...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up