Bart Williams, an attorney with Proskauer Rose LLP who represents Johnson & Johnson, argued that a plaintiff had failed to prove a connection between her cancer and the company’s baby powder.
LOS ANGELES — The first case in California to go to trial against Johnson & Johnson claiming the company knowingly failed to warn of a cancer link in its baby powder is now in the hands of a superior court jury.
Following closing arguments on Wednesday, the pharmaceutical company is seeking a second defense win after losing four out of five jury trials in Missouri state court, while plaintiffs’ attorneys hope to add to a collect...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In




