Government,
Civil Litigation
Aug. 18, 2017
Attorneys for CJP, state auditor argue limits on inquiry
Attorneys for the Commission on Judicial Performance and the state auditor debated Thursday whether the Constitution protects the judicial watchdog agency from an intrusive audit before a judge who will decide the matter.
SAN FRANCISCO — Attorneys for the Commission on Judicial Performance and the state auditor debated Thursday whether the Constitution protects the judicial watchdog agency from an intrusive audit before a judge who will decide the matter.
The attorney for the CJP, Michael von Loewenfeldt of Kerr & Wagstaffe LLP, argued that the California Constitution vests the power to decide the confidentiality of its documents in the CJP alone...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In