California Courts of Appeal
Aug. 28, 2017
Appellate court denies relief to JAMS plaintiff seeking disqualification of trial judge
An appellate court has denied a plaintiff’s petition to overturn an order striking his motion to disqualify the trial judge from his case, claiming bias.
An appellate court has affirmed the rejection of a plaintiff’s request to disqualify a trial judge from his case against JAMS.
The plaintiff — who originally sued JAMS for false advertising after one of its neutrals arbitrated his divorce — alleged the trial court judge was biased against him.
The one-page response is two sentences long, stating simply that the petition was reviewed by a three-judg...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In