Civil Litigation
Sep. 20, 2017
Defense rests in Starbucks carcinogen bench trial
In a Proposition 65 bench trial, the attorney suing more than 70 vendors, roasters and retailers claiming they failed to warn customers about a carcinogenic presence in coffee questioned the last defense witness Tuesday about whether statistics on coffee consumption were deflated.
LOS ANGELES — The attorney suing more than 60 vendors, roasters and retailers claiming they failed to warn customers about a carcinogenic presence in coffee questioned the last defense witness Tuesday about whether statistics on coffee consumption were deflated.
The Council for Education and Research on Toxics is trying to beat back the retailers’ last defense, which argues putting a warning label on coffee products is exempt under ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In