UC Davis School of Law Dean Kevin R. Johnson said the US Supreme Court’s cancellation of oral arguments in two travel ban cases makes sense because of mootness issues.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday cancelled oral arguments in two cases relating to President Trump’s executive orders banning travel from certain Muslim-majority counties.
Attorneys involved and academics said the development creates uncertainty for the future of the cases and that much would hinge on briefs the court ordered both sides to file by Oct. 5.
“It isn’t altogether surprising to me that ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In




