Judges and Judiciary,
Government,
Civil Litigation
Sep. 26, 2017
CJP, state auditor debate meaning of ‘confidential’ in dueling briefs
The fate of an audit of the Commission on Judicial Performance could come down to the meaning of a single word: confidential.
The fate of an audit of the Commission on Judicial Performance could come down to the meaning of a single word: confidential.
On Friday, attorneys for the state auditor filed their latest reply in the commission’s legal challenge to portions of an audit ordered by the Legislature last year. The brief follows San Francisco County Superior Court Judge Suzanne R. Bolanos’ demand last month for supplemental briefings.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy
here.